Prince
Andrew Bolkónski is a great match for Natasha Rostóva as a marriage between the
two would be greatly beneficial for both of them. Natasha being young and naïve
could gain a lot from a disciplined and well-read man such as Andrew.
Andrew’s intellect sets him apart from the other characters and that
combined with his humble personality and great depth in thinking about
philosophical matters make him highly intriguing. Tolstoy describes Andrew’s
thoughts as ones with “extraordinary clearness and rapidity”. Apart from his
mental abilities, his ability to change his outlook on life go hand in hand with
Tolstoy’s belief of self-improvement and the importance of its role in human
life[i].
After his near death experience, Andrew restructures his priorities, he says
his son is the “one thing left” now. The devotion he has for his son is shown
in Book Five, Chapter Seven and reveals his capacity to care. Andrew’s love for
Natasha is genuine; his love for her reignites passion in him and gives him a
“beaming, ecstatic expression of renewed life”[ii].
Unlike
Anatole and Boris, Andrew is interested in Natasha for who she is and not for
anything callous or calculated. As the novel progresses Andrew changes, in Book
Six, Chapter Two members of society see that Andrew has lost “pride and
contemptuous irony and acquired the serenity that comes with years”, serenity
Natasha could benefit from. Practically speaking, a marriage between Andrew and
Natasha would greatly help the Rostóvs, as they will not have to pay
dowry. As we have seen in the book and even historically, lack of funds
puts girls in vulnerable positions, desperate for the very few matches
available. Andrew is a match all of high society agrees is rare and highly
sought after, Natasha is considered lucky to have Andrew. Andrew being a
thinker and Natasha a feeler[iii],
a union between them would create a balance. Natasha’s effects on Andrew are
already evidently positive; driving him out of the sorrowful state he was in
after his involvement in the war. One thing to remember is Natasha is still
young; her permanent personality is yet to be set or revealed by the author.
She has potential and her positivity and generally carefree attitude if added
with discipline and calamity, things Andrew can provide, can lead her to
becoming something greater. One last thing, Natasha is not Lise. Andrew finds
Natasha’s “shy grace” admirable. Natasha also can fit in well in the country.
Part of the conflict between Lise and the Bolkónskis always surrounded her
craving aristocratic circles and finding country life dull.
I
had to limit myself! I could defend Andrew for days :-)
[i]
Idea first expressed in my third essay.
[ii]
Idea first expressed in my third essay.
[iii]
Idea and terms (thinker and feeler) first introduced in my third essay.
I totally get where you're coming from here and you make some good points. Personally, I was/am still a bit anti-Andrew. I just think that the two are complete opposites, which you see as a good thing but I see as a bad thing. I think that this is only because I love the idea of Natasha being carefree and apart from society. I want her to continue developing like this, which she can only do by making a different match or no match at all. What do you think of Mary/Nicholas though? I agree with what was said in class (that they are toned-down versions of their siblings) and I think that the match could work out nicely. Tolstoy seems to agree, at least for now.
ReplyDeleteWith Natasha and Andrew honestly I am just a huge supporter of that union as I find Andrew's character as very genuine and I value that aspect of his personality very much.For that reason, I think he would have been able to do nothing but good things for Natasha. He is a man of honor and truth. In terms of Mary and Nicholas, a possible union between the two would be highly amiable as it would fix a lot of the problems they have individually. Mary would have someone to spend her life with and Nicholas and the rest of his family can have a slight ease in their already heavily constrained financial situation.
ReplyDelete